netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] sh_eth changes for net-next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150302.153424.1752879269616212723.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 02 Mar 2015 15:34:24 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...ts.codethink.co.uk,
	nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@...esas.com, mitsuhiro.kimura.kc@...esas.com,
	ykaneko0929@...il.com, yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] sh_eth changes for net-next

From: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 20:31:05 +0000

> Some minor new features and fixes.
> 
> These depend in part on the series I sent earlier for net, specifically
> "sh_eth: WARN on access to a register not implemented in a particular
> chip" depends on "sh_eth: Fix RX recovery on R-Car in case of RX ring
> underrun".

Ben, in case it isn't clear, I'm waiting for you to respin your sh_eth
bug fix patch series for 'net' based upon the feedback you were given.

The longer it takes for you to resubmit a new version of that, the longer
this patch series is going to rot in patchwork and I really hate that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html