netdev - Re: [RFC 3/4] sparc: remove __GFP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 02 Mar 2015 15:44:24 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	mhocko@...e.cz
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
	rientjes@...gle.com, david@...morbit.com, tytso@....edu,
	mgorman@...e.de, penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, vipul@...lsio.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/4] sparc: remove __GFP_NOFAIL reuquirement

From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 21:33:04 +0100

> On Mon 02-03-15 15:04:05, David S. Miller wrote:
>> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
>> Date: Mon,  2 Mar 2015 14:54:42 +0100
>> 
>> > mdesc_kmalloc is currently requiring __GFP_NOFAIL allocation although it
>> > seems that the allocation failure is handled by all callers (via
>> > mdesc_alloc). __GFP_NOFAIL is a strong liability for the memory
>> > allocator and so the users are discouraged to use the flag unless the
>> > allocation failure is really a nogo. Drop the flag here as this doesn't
>> > seem to be the case.
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
>> 
>> It is a serious failure.
>> 
>> If we miss an MDESC update due to this allocation failure, the update
>> is not an event which gets retransmitted so we will lose the updated
>> machine description forever.
>> 
>> We really need this allocation to succeed.
> 
> OK, thanks for the clarification. This wasn't clear from the commit
> which has introduced this code. I will drop this patch. Would you
> accept something like the following instead?

Sure.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html