netdev - Re: [RFCv2 net-next 6/7] net: Refactor ip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 3 Mar 2015 11:55:35 -0800
From:	Andy Zhou <azhou@...ira.com>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	Joe Stringer <joestringer@...ira.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Justin Pettit <jpettit@...ira.com>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Subject: Re: [RFCv2 net-next 6/7] net: Refactor ip_defrag() APIs

Ah, I missed it.  Currently it is passed via IPCB. Would it be better
to pass it as a parameter?

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 12:20 AM, Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net> wrote:
> On 02.03, Joe Stringer wrote:
>> From: Andy Zhou <azhou@...ira.com>
>>
>> Currently, ip_defrag() does not keep track of the maximum fragmentation
>> size for each fragmented packet. This information is not necessary since
>> current Linux IP fragmentation always fragments a packet based on output
>> devices' MTU.
>
> It does, search for max_size.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html