[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54F77336.7040006@plumgrid.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 13:03:50 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To: Michal Sekletar <msekleta@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] filter: introduce SKF_AD_VLAN_PROTO BPF extension
On 3/4/15 12:41 PM, Michal Sekletar wrote:
> This commit introduces new BPF extension. It makes possible to load value of
> skb->vlan_proto (vlan tpid) to register A.
>
> Currently, vlan header is removed from frame and information is available to
> userspace only via tpacket interface. Hence, it is not possible to install
> filter which uses value of vlan tpid field.
>
> AFAICT only way how to filter based on tpid value is to reconstruct original
> frame encapsulation and interpret BPF filter code in userspace. Doing that is
> way slower than doing filtering in kernel.
>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
> Cc: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Sekletar <msekleta@...hat.com>
> ---
> @@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ Possible BPF extensions are shown in the following table:
> vlan_tci skb_vlan_tag_get(skb)
> vlan_pr skb_vlan_tag_present(skb)
> rand prandom_u32()
> + vlan_proto skb->vlan_proto
the patch is correct and looks clean, but I don't understand
the motivation for the patch.
There is already SKF_AD_VLAN_TAG_PRESENT. If it is set then only
two possible values of vlan_proto are ETH_P_8021Q or ETH_P_8021AD.
If there another vlan header inside the packet, it's AD.
So you can do the filtering already without adding new bpf extension...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists