[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54F8718D.2000003@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 07:09:01 -0800
From: roopa <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
CC: sfeldma@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] rocker: check for BRIDGE_FLAGS_SELF in bridge
setlink handler
On 3/5/15, 7:01 AM, roopa wrote:
> On 3/5/15, 12:36 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 01:15:29AM CET, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com wrote:
>>> From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
>>>
>>> With the recent addition of the NETIF_F_HW_SWITCH_OFFLOAD flag
>>> on rocker ports, the second command (bridge link set) below will
>>> turn off
>>> learning in the rocker hw (Scott/Jiri, need some confirmation from
>>> you that this is indeed a problem and if the below patch is ok).
>>>
>>> ip link set dev swp1 master br0
>>> bridge link set dev swp1 learning off master
>>> bridge link set dev swp1 learning_sync on self
>>>
>>> This patch fixes rocker to ignore learning setting when 'master'
>>> is set. This makes it possible to set/unset learning in kernel and
>>> bridge
>>> driver independently.
>>>
>>> The below command will continue to set learning on in both kernel
>>> and rocker
>>> hw:
>>> bridge link set dev swp1 learning on
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.c | 3 +++
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.c
>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.c
>>> index e5a15a4..d7c31d2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.c
>>> @@ -3769,6 +3769,9 @@ static int rocker_port_bridge_setlink(struct
>>> net_device *dev,
>>> struct nlattr *attr;
>>> int err;
>>>
>>> + if (flags && !(flags & BRIDGE_FLAGS_SELF))
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>> I think that the called should handle this case, not every particular
>> driver. How about to put this into rtnl_bridge_setlink?
>
> The problem is setlink can contain many more attributes than just
> learning.
> And for most attributes you want to mirror them in hardware.
> Only a few attributes like learning, you want to be able to set them
> in the kernel driver
> differently than in hardware.
>
> We have previously discussed encoding hw/sw in the upper bits of
> bridge port attributes.
> I was trying to avoid that and use the existing master/self to achieve
> the same.
>
> I will repost alternatives if I can think of something.
Just adding more clarification to my previous comment: I have not
confirmed if learning in rocker is really broken.
My patch comment specifically says that the sequence of commands listed
may turn off learning in rocker hardware unintentionally.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists