netdev - Re: [PATCHv4 net-next 2/3] ipv4: Use binary search to choose tcp PMTU probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54F7C146.603@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 05 Mar 2015 10:36:54 +0800
From:	Fan Du <fengyuleidian0615@...il.com>
To:	John Heffner <johnwheffner@...il.com>
CC:	Fan Du <fan.du@...el.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 net-next 2/3] ipv4: Use binary search to choose tcp
 PMTU probe_size

于 2015年03月04日 21:39, John Heffner 写道:
>> >I suspect there's plenty of room for further improvement in the
>> >probing heuristic, but this seems like a reasonable improvement.
>> >
>> >Acked-by: John Heffner<johnwheffner@...il.com>
> Actually, one final suggestion here.  The cost of a failed probe is
> much higher than a successful probe.  I'd suggest still bounding the
> probe segment size to no more than 2*cur_mss.  (Think of a common case
> where mss_clamp = 9000 - headers, but the actual path MTU = 1500.)

huh...
Are you serious about clamping probe size to no more than 2*current_mss?
What about the opposite scenario where path MTU enlarges, e.g., current_mss
is nearing search_low?

I will make next version incorporating:
a. Update ip-sysctl.txt
b. Zero probe_size before reset search_low/high


>    -John

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html