[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150305065053.GA2062@nanopsycho.orion>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 07:50:53 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Cc: Guy Harris <guy@...m.mit.edu>,
Michal Sekletar <msekleta@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] filter: introduce SKF_AD_VLAN_PROTO BPF extension
Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 12:47:06AM CET, ast@...mgrid.com wrote:
>On 3/4/15 1:14 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>>
>>On Mar 4, 2015, at 1:03 PM, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com> wrote:
>>
>>>the patch is correct and looks clean, but I don't understand
>>>the motivation for the patch.
>>>There is already SKF_AD_VLAN_TAG_PRESENT. If it is set then only
>>>two possible values of vlan_proto are ETH_P_8021Q or ETH_P_8021AD.
>>>If there another vlan header inside the packet, it's AD.
>>>So you can do the filtering already without adding new bpf extension...
>>
>>I presume he's referring to
>>
>> https://github.com/the-tcpdump-group/libpcap/issues/397
>>
>>or
>>
>> https://github.com/the-tcpdump-group/libpcap/issues/390
>
>ok. context is clear.
>yet, it still sounds like something to fix inside libpcap.
Libpcap need to somehow let kernel now what vlan proto it should filter on.
Also, it is not true that another vlan header inside packet is AD. You
can have packet with just AD header (or 2 AD or 2 Q, etc).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists