netdev - Re: [PATCH nf-next 0/8] netfilter: untangle bridge and bridge netfilter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 9 Mar 2015 14:59:10 +0100
From:	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc:	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next 0/8] netfilter: untangle bridge and bridge
 netfilter

Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org> wrote:
> > nf_bridge is kmalloced blob with some extra information, including
> > the bridge in and outports (mainly for iptables' physdev match).
> > It also has various state bits so we know what manipulations
> > have been performed by bridge netfilter on the skb (e.g.
> > ppp header stripping).
> >
> > nf_bridge also provides scratch space where br_netfilter saves
> > (and later restores) various things, e.g. ipv4 address for
> > dnat detection, mac address to fix up ip fragmented skbs, etc.
> > 
> > But in almost all cases we can avoid using ->data completely.
> 
> I think one of the goals of this patchset is to prepare the removal of
> that nf_bridge pointer from sk_buff which sounds as a good idea to me.
> 
> Did you consider to implement this scratchpad area using a per-cpu
> area? I mean, something similar to what we used to have in
> ip_conntrack for events:

I see that I misread part of what you wrote.

We cannot use percpu data for nf_bridge_info; at least its not trivial
to do (I tried).

Main issues are:
- nfqueue (we have to save/restore info)
- local delivery (skb is enqueued in backlog)
- skb is dropped (we need to reset scratch data)
- DNAT mac hack (skb can be queued in qdisc).

We _can_ use percpu data for passing the original mac
header to the ip_fragment output function.  But, as mentioned,
there is a patch in netdev patchwork that adds extra output
parameter for use with OVS so it seems cleaner to (re-) use common
api in both OVS and br netfilter.

> BTW, 6/8 I think needs some ifdef to make sure NF_CONNTRACK is in
> placed.

Right, thanks for catching this.

> 7/8 needs NF_BRDIGE_MAX_MAC_HEADER_LENGTH which seems to have
> a small typo in it, well these are dependent of 4/8 anyway.

Sorry -- I'm dense -- what typo? :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html