[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150310183555.GB1743@kria>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 19:35:55 +0100
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
To: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: suspicious RCU usage in fib_table_flush_external
I ran into this while deleting a netns with some routes:
===============================
[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
4.0.0-rc2-00722-g8ac467e837a2-dirty #674 Not tainted
-------------------------------
net/ipv4/fib_trie.c:1606 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
4 locks held by kworker/u4:1/50:
#0: ("%s""netns"){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81086525>] process_one_work+0x155/0x880
#1: (net_cleanup_work){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81086525>] process_one_work+0x155/0x880
#2: (net_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81647cfd>] cleanup_net+0x7d/0x230
#3: (&(&net->rules_mod_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81674ce4>] fib_rules_unregister+0x34/0x100
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/u4:1 Not tainted 4.0.0-rc2-00722-g8ac467e837a2-dirty #674
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.7.5-20140617_173321-var-lib-archbuild-testing-x86_64-tobias 04/01/2014
Workqueue: netns cleanup_net
0000000000000001 ffff88001dffbba8 ffffffff81835bd0 0000000000000011
ffff88001dd95690 ffff88001dffbbd8 ffffffff810b5505 0000000000000001
0000000000000001 ffff88001da86270 ffff88001d528008 ffff88001dffbc08
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff81835bd0>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x6e
[<ffffffff810b5505>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xd5/0x110
[<ffffffff81710421>] fib_table_flush_external+0xe1/0x130
[<ffffffff81708808>] fib_flush_external+0x38/0x60
[<ffffffff81719dee>] fib4_rule_delete+0x2e/0x30
[<ffffffff81674d4b>] fib_rules_unregister+0x9b/0x100
[<ffffffff8171a2a5>] fib4_rules_exit+0x15/0x20
[<ffffffff817078ab>] ip_fib_net_exit+0x1b/0x120
[<ffffffff817079e5>] fib_net_exit+0x35/0x40
since fib_table_flush_external wants RTNL, should we just move
rtnl_lock() before fib4_rules_exit in ip_fib_net_exit?
diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
index e067770235bf..ed94bc80eb78 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
@@ -1126,11 +1126,12 @@ static void ip_fib_net_exit(struct net *net)
{
unsigned int i;
+ rtnl_lock();
+
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES
fib4_rules_exit(net);
#endif
- rtnl_lock();
for (i = 0; i < FIB_TABLE_HASHSZ; i++) {
struct hlist_head *head = &net->ipv4.fib_table_hash[i];
struct hlist_node *tmp;
--
Sabrina
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists