netdev - Why do we prefer skb->priority to tc filters?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHA+R7Oz=Je_avfzjLib0YaQRUArEpt+sm1qNqcV_oEvUp3=eA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 Mar 2015 10:34:00 -0700
From:	Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
To:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Why do we prefer skb->priority to tc filters?

Hi,


Not sure about classful Qdisc's, for classless ones like fq_codel, we
also prefer skb->priority value over tc filters:

        if (TC_H_MAJ(skb->priority) == sch->handle &&
            TC_H_MIN(skb->priority) > 0 &&
            TC_H_MIN(skb->priority) <= q->flows_cnt)
                return TC_H_MIN(skb->priority);

        filter = rcu_dereference_bh(q->filter_list);
        if (!filter)
                return fq_codel_hash(q, skb) + 1;

        *qerr = NET_XMIT_SUCCESS | __NET_XMIT_BYPASS;
        result = tc_classify(skb, filter, &res);

Given that skb->priority can be specified in user-space, doesn't this
mean some application can always override our rules specified by tc
filters? I think we should always respect tc filters over any
application setting.

For discussion, I mean something like below makes more sense for me:

        struct tcf_result res;
        int result;

-       if (TC_H_MAJ(skb->priority) == sch->handle &&
-           TC_H_MIN(skb->priority) > 0 &&
-           TC_H_MIN(skb->priority) <= q->flows_cnt)
-               return TC_H_MIN(skb->priority);
-
        filter = rcu_dereference_bh(q->filter_list);
-       if (!filter)
+       if (!filter) {
+               if (TC_H_MAJ(skb->priority) == sch->handle &&
+                   TC_H_MIN(skb->priority) > 0 &&
+                   TC_H_MIN(skb->priority) <= q->flows_cnt)
+                       return TC_H_MIN(skb->priority);
+
                return fq_codel_hash(q, skb) + 1;
+       }

        *qerr = NET_XMIT_SUCCESS | __NET_XMIT_BYPASS;
        result = tc_classify(skb, filter, &res);

What do you think?

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html