[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150312151507.GI2896@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:15:07 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 tip 2/8] tracing: attach BPF programs to kprobes
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 09:18:48PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> +unsigned int trace_call_bpf(struct bpf_prog *prog, void *ctx)
> +{
> + unsigned int ret;
> + int cpu;
> +
> + if (in_nmi()) /* not supported yet */
> + return 1;
> +
> + preempt_disable_notrace();
> +
> + cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> + if (unlikely(per_cpu(bpf_prog_active, cpu)++ != 0)) {
> + /* since some bpf program is already running on this cpu,
> + * don't call into another bpf program (same or different)
> + * and don't send kprobe event into ring-buffer,
> + * so return zero here
> + */
> + ret = 0;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
You've so far tried very hard to not get into tracing; and then you call
rcu_read_lock() :-)
So either document why this isn't a problem, provide
rcu_read_lock_notrace() or switch to RCU-sched and thereby avoid the
problem.
> + ret = BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, ctx);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + out:
> + per_cpu(bpf_prog_active, cpu)--;
> + preempt_enable_notrace();
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(trace_call_bpf);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists