lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55013BD4.2080605@windriver.com>
Date:	Thu, 12 Mar 2015 15:10:12 +0800
From:	yzhu1 <Yanjun.Zhu@...driver.com>
To:	<brian.haley@...com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<alexandre.dietsch@...driver.com>,
	<clinton.slabbert@...driver.com>, <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
	<jmorris@...ei.org>, <kaber@...sh.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<ulf.samuelsson@...csson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/1] neighbour: Support broadcast ARP in neighbor PROPE
 state

The state machine is in the attachment.

Best Regards!
Zhu Yanjun
On 03/12/2015 02:58 PM, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
> V2:
>    set ARP_PROBE_BCAST default N.
>
> V1:
>    Have a problem with an HP router at a certain location, which
>    is configured to only answer to broadcast ARP requests.
>    That cannot be changed.
>
>    The first ARP request the kernel sends out, is a broadcast request,
>    which is fine, but after the reply, the kernel sends unicast requests,
>    which will not get any replies.
>
>    The ARP entry will after some time enter STALE state,
>    and if nothing is done it will time out, and be removed.
>    This process takes to long, and I have been told that it is
>    difficult to makes changes that will eventually remove it.
>
>    Have tried to change the state from STALE to INCOMPLETE, which failed,
>    and then tried to change the state to PROBE which also failed.
>
>    The stack is only sending out unicasts, and never broadcast.
>    Is there any way to get the stack to send out a broadcast ARP
>    without having to wait for the entry to be removed?
>
>    I think the recommended behaviour in IPv6 is to send out 3 unicasts
>    and if all fails, to send out broadcasts.
>
> Zhu Yanjun (1):
>    neighbour: Support broadcast ARP in neighbor PROPE state
>
>   include/net/neighbour.h        |  7 ++++++
>   include/uapi/linux/neighbour.h |  6 +++++
>   include/uapi/linux/sysctl.h    |  3 +++
>   kernel/sysctl_binary.c         |  3 +++
>   net/core/neighbour.c           | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>   net/ipv4/Kconfig               | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   net/ipv4/arp.c                 |  7 ++++--
>   7 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>


Download attachment "1.jpg" of type "image/jpeg" (99365 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ