netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/3] EEE support for mv88e6172

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55015248.9090103@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Thu, 12 Mar 2015 01:46:00 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, andrew@...n.ch
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] EEE support for mv88e6172

On 03/11/2015 01:59 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 23:05:56 +0100
>
>> This patchset contains two cleanups and then adds EEE support
>> to the mv88e6172, using the base provided by Guenter Roeck
>>
>> Tested on a WRT1900AC with mv88e6172 and DIR665 with mv88e6171.
>
> This series does not apply cleanly to net-next.
>
> I really want to discourage you posting patches against trees other
> that net and net-next like this, without CLEARLY marking in the
> Subject lines that this patch series is special and that I should
> not try to review and apply it at all.
>

Andrew,

I see two options: I can submit my entire series of HW bridging
patches for mv88e6xxx, or I submit the introductory patches of that
series (the ones refactoring the code to prepare for HW bridging)
plus your (rebased) patches on top of it.

What do you think ?

Thanks,
Guenter


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html