[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1426152704.11398.149.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 02:31:44 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Maciej Zenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] bonding: Handle notifications during
work-queue processing gracefully
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 22:54 -0700, Mahesh Bandewar wrote:
> +static inline void bond_set_notif_pending(struct bonding *bond,
> + bond_notif_pending_t bit, bool set)
> +{
> + if (set)
> + test_and_set_bit(bit, &bond->notif_work_mask);
> + else
> + test_and_clear_bit(bit, &bond->notif_work_mask);
> +}
If you do not need the return value of test_and_set_bit() and
test_and_clear_bit(), why are you using them, since they are more
expensive ?
May I suggest instead :
static inline void bond_notif_pending_set(struct bonding *bond,
bond_notif_pending_t bit)
{
set_bit(bit, &bond->notif_work_mask);
}
static inline void bond_notif_pending_clear(struct bonding *bond,
bond_notif_pending_t bit)
{
clear_bit(bit, &bond->notif_work_mask);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists