[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150313.154844.1460460664757494447.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:48:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: f.fainelli@...il.com
Cc: pgynther@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jaedon.shin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: bcmgenet: rewrite bcmgenet_rx_refill()
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 11:28:52 -0700
> On 12/03/15 15:48, Petri Gynther wrote:
>> Currently, bcmgenet_desc_rx() calls bcmgenet_rx_refill() at the end of
>> Rx packet processing loop, after the current Rx packet has already been
>> passed to napi_gro_receive(). However, bcmgenet_rx_refill() might fail
>> to allocate a new Rx skb, thus leaving a hole on the Rx queue where no
>> valid Rx buffer exists.
>>
>> To eliminate this situation:
>> 1. Rewrite bcmgenet_rx_refill() to retain the current Rx skb on the Rx
>> queue if a new replacement Rx skb can't be allocated and DMA-mapped.
>> In this case, the data on the current Rx skb is effectively dropped.
>> 2. Modify bcmgenet_desc_rx() to call bcmgenet_rx_refill() at the top of
>> Rx packet processing loop, so that the new replacement Rx skb is
>> already in place before the current Rx skb is processed.
>
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>
> Thanks! Have not noticed any performance impact doing 64B/1500B testing.
Applied, thanks everyone.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists