netdev - Re: [PATCH] inet: Clean up inet_csk_wait_for_connect() vs. might

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150316.171243.1969465707208233939.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 16 Mar 2015 17:12:43 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc:	peterz@...radead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] inet: Clean up inet_csk_wait_for_connect() vs.
 might_sleep()

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:19:24 -0700

> In commit 26cabd31259ba43f68026ce3f62b78094124333f
> Peter added a sched_annotate_sleep() in sk_wait_event()
> 
> Is the following patch needed as well ?

Who is asking this question and who is it directed at?

It looks like something that needs to be resolved before I apply this
patch, right?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html