netdev - Re: No SO_BUSY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:20:01 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Lukas Erlacher <erlacher@...tum.de>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: No SO_BUSY_POLL for UDP?

On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 23:26 +0100, Lukas Erlacher wrote:
> Hello netdev,
> 
> I am trying to benchmark SO_BUSY_POLL and it appears not to be functioning with UDP.
> 
> I have been trying with netperf as well as with a small udp echo server and a load generator; I am trying to reproduce the Intel benchmarks[1] so I am using X520 NICs with rx-usecs set to 100.
> 
> Performing TCP_RR netperf test with /proc/sys/net/core/busy_{read,poll} set to 0 produces this:
> 
> > root@...ipeda ~/MoonGen (git)-[master] # netperf -H 192.168.1.2,udpv4 -t TCP_RR -l 5
> > MIGRATED TCP REQUEST/RESPONSE TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.1.2 () port 0 AF_INET : demo : first burst 0
> > Local /Remote
> > Socket Size   Request  Resp.   Elapsed  Trans.
> > Send   Recv   Size     Size    Time     Rate
> > bytes  Bytes  bytes    bytes   secs.    per sec
> >
> > 16384  87380  1        1       5.00     9762.51
> 
> With busy_* set to 50 produces this:
> 
> > root@...ipeda ~/MoonGen (git)-[master] # netperf -H 192.168.1.2,udpv4 -t TCP_RR -l 5
> > MIGRATED TCP REQUEST/RESPONSE TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.1.2 () port 0 AF_INET : demo : first burst 0
> > Local /Remote
> > Socket Size   Request  Resp.   Elapsed  Trans.
> > Send   Recv   Size     Size    Time     Rate
> > bytes  Bytes  bytes    bytes   secs.    per sec
> >
> > 16384  87380  1        1       5.00     42127.63
> > 16384  87380
> 
>  From that I conclude that the system manages 9700 round-trips per second without busy poll set and 42127 with busy poll enabled. So, busy polling works with TCP.
> 
> However, no matter what busy_* is set to, UDP_RR produces this:
> 
> > root@...ipeda ~/MoonGen (git)-[master] # netperf -H 192.168.1.2,udpv4 -t UDP_RR -l 5
> > MIGRATED UDP REQUEST/RESPONSE TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.1.2 () port 0 AF_INET : demo : first burst 0
> > Local /Remote
> > Socket Size   Request  Resp.   Elapsed  Trans.
> > Send   Recv   Size     Size    Time     Rate
> > bytes  Bytes  bytes    bytes   secs.    per sec
> >
> > 212992 212992 1        1       5.00     9763.20
> > 212992 212992
> 
> Around 9700 round-trips per second no matter the busy_poll setting.
> 
> The Intel whitepaper on busy polling[1] shows a UDP benchmark, so I am assuming that busy polling should be available for UDP sockets. Is this a regression or was the feature intentionally removed? As best I can tell the behaviour is identical on kernels 3.11, 3.16 and 3.19, but on 3.11 and 3.16 I have only tested it with my custom udp echo server.
> 
> Best regards,
> Lukas Erlacher
> 
> [1] http://www.intel.in/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/white-papers/open-source-kernel-enhancements-paper.pdf


busypoll should be available on _connected_ UDP sockets. Otherwise, we
would have to look all RX queues of the NIC, not a single one.

Try netperf  -t UDP_RR -- -N -n

    -n                Use the connected socket for UDP locally
    -N                Use the connected socket for UDP remotely

(Although I believe netserver->netperf is ignoring the -N option, that
is a netperf bug)

check with ss -a|grep udp






--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html