netdev - Re: [PATCH] mm: kill kmemcheck

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150316223318.02145751@grimm.local.home>
Date:	Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:33:18 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: kill kmemcheck

On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 21:48:23 -0400
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com> wrote:


> Steven,
> 
> 
> Since the only objection raised was the too-newiness of GCC 4.9.2/5.0, what
> would you consider a good time-line for removal?
> 
> I haven't heard any "over my dead body" objections, so I guess that trying
> to remove it while no distribution was shipping the compiler that would make
> it possible was premature.
> 
> Although, on the other hand, I'd be happy if we can have a reasonable date
> (that is before my kid goes to college), preferably even before the next
> LSF/MM so that we could have a mission accomplished thingie with a round
> of beers and commemorative t-shirts.

Perhaps give it 2 years? With fair notice that it will soon be gone?

In 2 years I should be up to gcc 4.9 ;-)

I still need to test it out.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html