[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D1CB024AB@AcuExch.aculab.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:51:25 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Herbert Xu' <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"tgraf@...g.ch" <tgraf@...g.ch>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [v1 PATCH 1/14] rhashtable: Remove shift from bucket_table
From: Herbert Xu
> Sent: 15 March 2015 10:44
> Keeping both size and shift is silly. We only need one.
...
> --- a/lib/rhashtable.c
> +++ b/lib/rhashtable.c
> @@ -162,7 +162,6 @@ static struct bucket_table *bucket_table_alloc(struct rhashtable *ht,
> return NULL;
>
> tbl->size = nbuckets;
> - tbl->shift = ilog2(nbuckets);
>
> if (alloc_bucket_locks(ht, tbl) < 0) {
> bucket_table_free(tbl);
> @@ -189,7 +188,7 @@ static bool rht_grow_above_75(const struct rhashtable *ht,
> {
> /* Expand table when exceeding 75% load */
> return atomic_read(&ht->nelems) > (tbl->size / 4 * 3) &&
> - (!ht->p.max_shift || tbl->shift < ht->p.max_shift);
> + (!ht->p.max_shift || tbl->size < (1 << ht->p.max_shift));
Looks like you could pre-calculate the 'grow_at' size.
The test above would then be:
return atomic_read(&ht->nelems > tbl->grow_at_size);
Similarly for the shrink.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists