[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150317112523.GB11671@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 22:25:23 +1100
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc: "tgraf@...g.ch" <tgraf@...g.ch>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [v1 PATCH 1/14] rhashtable: Remove shift from bucket_table
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:22:44AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
>
> But won't the rehashed table be just as likely to have a long list?
> So you are likely to get an immediate rehash?
Not if the threshold is set to a value that should never be hit
at 100% utilisation.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists