[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150317.131250.1794140944101735383.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 13:12:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: fw@...len.de
Cc: pablo@...filter.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, azhou@...ira.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 nf-next 1/6] net: untangle ip_fragment and bridge
netfilter
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:11:52 +0100
> And doing route lookups will break things for some people, we have zero
> guarantee that a bridge has the needed routing information,
> its valid to not even configure a default gateway on a bridge.
Then without a proper route you absolutely cannot choose an
appropriate MTU from which to perform fragmentation.
Just accept that basic fact.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists