netdev - Re: [PATCH V2 0/1] neighbour: Support broadcast ARP in neighbor PROPE state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <550A3342.2020600@windriver.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:24:02 +0800
From:	yzhu1 <Yanjun.Zhu@...driver.com>
To:	Ulf Samuelsson <ulf.samuelsson@...csson.com>,
	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <hideaki.yoshifuji@...aclelinux.com>,
	<brian.haley@...com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<alexandre.dietsch@...driver.com>,
	<clinton.slabbert@...driver.com>, <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
	<jmorris@...ei.org>, <kaber@...sh.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	"YOSHIFUJI Hideaki (USAGI Project)" <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/1] neighbour: Support broadcast ARP in neighbor PROPE
 state

On 03/18/2015 04:51 PM, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>
> On 03/12/2015 09:42 AM, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> yzhu1 wrote:
>>> The state machine is in the attachment.
>>>
>>> Best Regards!
>>> Zhu Yanjun
>>> On 03/12/2015 02:58 PM, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
>>>> V2:
>>>>    set ARP_PROBE_BCAST default N.
>>>>
>>>> V1:
>>>>    Have a problem with an HP router at a certain location, which
>>>>    is configured to only answer to broadcast ARP requests.
>>>>    That cannot be changed.
>>>>
>>>>    The first ARP request the kernel sends out, is a broadcast request,
>>>>    which is fine, but after the reply, the kernel sends unicast 
>>>> requests,
>>>>    which will not get any replies.
>>>>
>>>>    The ARP entry will after some time enter STALE state,
>>>>    and if nothing is done it will time out, and be removed.
>>>>    This process takes to long, and I have been told that it is
>>>>    difficult to makes changes that will eventually remove it.
>>>>
>>>>    Have tried to change the state from STALE to INCOMPLETE, which 
>>>> failed,
>>>>    and then tried to change the state to PROBE which also failed.
>>>>
>>>>    The stack is only sending out unicasts, and never broadcast.
>>>>    Is there any way to get the stack to send out a broadcast ARP
>>>>    without having to wait for the entry to be removed?
>>
>> Neighbour subsystem will send multicast probes after unicast
>> probes in NUD_PROBE state if mcast_solicit is more than
>> ucast_solicit.  Try setting net.ipv4.neigh.*.ucast_solicit to
>> the value less than net.ipv4.neigh.*.mcast_solicit, please?
>> e.g.
>>
>> net.ipv4.neigh.eth0.mcast_solicit = 3
>> net.ipv4.neigh.eth0.ucast_solicit = 1
>>
>> --yoshfuji
>>
> I dont see how, and I would like to focus on code discussion.
>
> Below is simplified pseudo code of the timer handler
> after you have reached REACHABLE the first time.
>
>     "mcast_solicit" is not used at all.
>
> It is only used when in INCOMPLETE state as far as I can tell.
>
> I do not see that the stack is returning to INCOMPLETE
> after it has reached REACHABLE once.
>
> Can it do so? In that case, in what part of the code.
>
> =============================
> int    confirmed;     /* time of last ARP reply */
> int    ucast_solicit;    /* sysctl */
> int    app_solicit;    /* sysctl */
> neigh_timer_handler()
> begin
>     if (in REACHABLE) then
>         if ("current time" <=( confirmed + reachable)) then
>             we are OK, test later
>         else if ("current time" <= used + DELAY_PROBE_TIME) then
>             set state to DELAY
>         else
>             set state to STALE
>         end if
>     else if (in DELAY) then
>         if ("current time" <= confirmed + DELAY_PROBE_TIME) then
>             change state to REACHABLE
>             send notification
>         else
>             change state to PROBE
>             probes = 0;
>             do not send notification
>         end if
>
>     if (in PROBE state) then
>         if (probes >= (ucast_solicit + app_solicit)) then
>             change state to FAILED
>             send notification
>         end if
>     end if
>
>     if (in PROBE state) then
>         send ARP request;
>     end if
>
>     if (notify) then
>         send notification
>     end if
> end
>
> ====================
> Anyway, the behaviour I would like to see is:
>
> INCOMPLETE:
>     Send 3 broadcast ARP
> PROBE
>     Send 3 unicast ARP
>     Send 3 broadcast ARP
>
> which not possible with your suggestion
> I do not want to send 6 broadcast ARP in INCOMPLETE state.
Yes. I agree with you. I made tests for several days. I can not 
reproduce this with the method from YOSHIFUJI.

Best Regards!
Zhu Yanjun

>
>
> Best Regards,
> Ulf Samuelsson
>
>
>
>>
>>>>
>>>>    I think the recommended behaviour in IPv6 is to send out 3 unicasts
>>>>    and if all fails, to send out broadcasts.
>>>>
>>>> Zhu Yanjun (1):
>>>>    neighbour: Support broadcast ARP in neighbor PROPE state
>>>>
>>>>   include/net/neighbour.h        |  7 ++++++
>>>>   include/uapi/linux/neighbour.h |  6 +++++
>>>>   include/uapi/linux/sysctl.h    |  3 +++
>>>>   kernel/sysctl_binary.c         |  3 +++
>>>>   net/core/neighbour.c           | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>>   net/ipv4/Kconfig               | 57 
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>   net/ipv4/arp.c                 |  7 ++++--
>>>>   7 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html