[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <550D6137.2040509@hitachi.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 21:16:55 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 tip 1/9] bpf: make internal bpf API independent of
CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL ifdefs
(2015/03/21 8:30), Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
>
> Socket filter code and other subsystems with upcoming eBPF support should
> not need to deal with the fact that we have CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL defined or
> not.
>
> Having the bpf syscall as a config option is a nice thing and I'd expect
> it to stay that way for expert users (I presume one day the default setting
> of it might change, though), but code making use of it should not care if
> it's actually enabled or not.
>
> Instead, hide this via header files and let the rest deal with it.
>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Thank you,
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
> ---
> include/linux/bpf.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index bbfceb756452..c2e21113ecc0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -113,8 +113,6 @@ struct bpf_prog_type_list {
> enum bpf_prog_type type;
> };
>
> -void bpf_register_prog_type(struct bpf_prog_type_list *tl);
> -
> struct bpf_prog;
>
> struct bpf_prog_aux {
> @@ -129,11 +127,25 @@ struct bpf_prog_aux {
> };
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
> +void bpf_register_prog_type(struct bpf_prog_type_list *tl);
> +
> void bpf_prog_put(struct bpf_prog *prog);
> +struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_get(u32 ufd);
> #else
> -static inline void bpf_prog_put(struct bpf_prog *prog) {}
> +static inline void bpf_register_prog_type(struct bpf_prog_type_list *tl)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_get(u32 ufd)
> +{
> + return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void bpf_prog_put(struct bpf_prog *prog)
> +{
> +}
> #endif
> -struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_get(u32 ufd);
> +
> /* verify correctness of eBPF program */
> int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog *fp, union bpf_attr *attr);
>
>
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists