[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87fv8wals4.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 14:12:59 -0500
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Robert Shearman <rshearma@...cade.com>
Cc: <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] mpls: Remove incorrect PHP comment
Robert Shearman <rshearma@...cade.com> writes:
> Popping the last label on the stack does not necessarily imply
> performing penultimate hop popping. There is no reason why this
> couldn't be the last hop in the network, so remove the comment.
So this change I will disagree with.
What the code implements is Penultimate hop popping. Even if you send
the packets over loopback that is what the code is doing.
This is relevant because I think the code may actually be wrong in the
local reception case. By preforming penultimate hop popping and
receving the code on loopback I think this code allows bypassing
iptables rules that apply to incoming ip packets. Certainly there is a
loss of information as to which hardware interface the packet came in on
that it may be desirable to correct.
Eric
> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Shearman <rshearma@...cade.com>
> ---
> net/mpls/af_mpls.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
> index 0d6763a..bf3459a 100644
> --- a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
> +++ b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
> @@ -199,7 +199,6 @@ static int mpls_forward(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_MPLS_UC);
>
> if (unlikely(!new_header_size && dec.bos)) {
> - /* Penultimate hop popping */
> if (!mpls_egress(rt, skb, dec))
> goto drop;
> } else {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists