netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/2] netfilter: preparatory patches for set extensions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150322044846.GB31192@acer.localdomain>
Date:	Sun, 22 Mar 2015 04:48:46 +0000
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	pablo@...filter.org, davem@...emloft.net, tgraf@...g.ch,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] netfilter: preparatory patches for set extensions

On 22.03, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 03:38:08PM +0000, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > 
> > @Dave and Pablo: these patches apply on top of nf-next and a bunch
> > of patches I just sent to Pablo, but also need Herbert's recent
> > changes in net-next. Additionally I have more patches coming up
> > which depend on these changes. In order to simplify things, I'd
> > suggest to have the rhashtable change go through Pablo's tree if
> > you don't mind.
> 
> I have more patches (multiple rehashing) coming up that will
> conflict with this.

I have a set of about 30 patches myself which depend on this simple
one liner, so I'd appreciate if we can come to a quick resolution
here so I can continue merging them instead of redoing them every
second day.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html