[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1YZahc-0000hb-W6@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:53:44 +1100
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [v1 PATCH 2/10] rhashtable: Eliminate unnecessary branch in rht_key_hashfn
When rht_key_hashfn is called from rhashtable itself and params
is equal to ht->p, there is no point in checking params.key_len
and falling back to ht->p.key_len.
For some reason gcc couldn't figure out that params is the same
as ht->p. So let's help it by only checking params.key_len when
it's a constant.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
---
include/linux/rhashtable.h | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rhashtable.h b/include/linux/rhashtable.h
index 18a6488..287b609 100644
--- a/include/linux/rhashtable.h
+++ b/include/linux/rhashtable.h
@@ -199,8 +199,11 @@ static inline unsigned int rht_key_hashfn(
struct rhashtable *ht, const struct bucket_table *tbl,
const void *key, const struct rhashtable_params params)
{
- return rht_bucket_index(tbl, params.hashfn(key, params.key_len ?:
- ht->p.key_len,
+ unsigned key_len = __builtin_constant_p(params.key_len) ?
+ (params.key_len ?: ht->p.key_len) :
+ params.key_len;
+
+ return rht_bucket_index(tbl, params.hashfn(key, key_len,
tbl->hash_rnd));
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists