lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150323214422.GA19938@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:44:23 +1100
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v3 PATCH 9/9] rhashtable: Add immediate rehash during insertion

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:50:33PM +0000, Thomas Graf wrote:
>
> 2nd: Seems like you rely on an underflow to allow to "disable"
> the elasticity limit. Fair enough, but it would be great to
> have the limit configurable as well.
> 
> How about making elasticity a signed int, default to 16 if user
> specifies 0 and require it to be set to -1 (through a define)
> to actually disable the behaviour. That would avoid requiring
> two variables to implement this and makes the limit configurable
> at the same time.

I specifically made it this way because I don't think the users
should be touching the actual limit.  This is something that you
always want to enable unless you're in the situation of netfilter
where you don't care.

If you did care then 16 is sort of intrinsic to the 32-bit hash
that we're using.  Going below doesn't make much sense because
you may run into false warnings due to double rehashes (that's
how I discovered 4 was uesless, very quickly :) Remember the
rehash is only there to detect pathological cases where people
are actively attacking us.  Otherwise the 100% utilisation check
will kick in.

Going above 16 means that you're hashing multiple objects with
the same key.  Then you'd want to disable this altogether.

The rhashtable already has too many knobs and I don't want to
add anything unnecessary to rhashtable_params.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ