[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE4R7bDLi2hjA8iqtHZgbW=D4KZwJ_LLnpK2b0kNHzHoAVvN9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:58:15 -0700
From: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, roopa <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Arad, Ronen" <ronen.arad@...el.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v2] switchdev: bridge: drop hardware
forwarded packets
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 03:29:21PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >
>> >diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.c
>> >b/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.c
>> >index aab962c..0f7217f7 100644
>> >--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.c
>> >+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.c
>> >@@ -3931,15 +3931,28 @@ unmap_frag:
>> > return -EMSGSIZE;
>> > }
>> >
>> >+static bool rocker_port_dev_check(struct net_device *dev);
>> >+
>> > static netdev_tx_t rocker_port_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct
>> >net_device *dev)
>> > {
>> > struct rocker_port *rocker_port = netdev_priv(dev);
>> > struct rocker *rocker = rocker_port->rocker;
>> > struct rocker_desc_info *desc_info;
>> > struct rocker_tlv *frags;
>> >+ struct net_device *in_dev;
>> > int i;
>> > int err;
>> >
>> >+ if (rocker_port_is_bridged(rocker_port)) {
>> >+ rcu_read_lock();
>> >+ in_dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(dev_net(dev), skb->skb_iif);
>>
>> Hmm, you iterate over all ports for every xmit call :/
>> Would be nicer if skb_iif would be netdev poiter. Not sure it is doable.
>>
> It may be easier (and faster) to loop through all rocker ports and try to find
> one with the same ifindex. Then the dev_check call would not be necessary.
>
> If the rocker switch can be attached to multiple bridges, it may also be
> necessary to check if the bridge group is the same for both ports.
>
> Guenter
Yes, good suggestions. This is the flexibility part if we do the
check in the driver rather than code above.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists