[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55130CA8.2030700@cloudius-systems.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:29:44 +0200
From: Vlad Zolotarov <vladz@...udius-systems.com>
To: "Tantilov, Emil S" <emil.s.tantilov@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"avi@...udius-systems.com" <avi@...udius-systems.com>,
"gleb@...udius-systems.com" <gleb@...udius-systems.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 3/7] ixgbe: Add a RETA query command to VF-PF
channel API
On 03/25/15 20:03, Tantilov, Emil S wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Vlad Zolotarov
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 6:06 AM
>> Subject: [PATCH net-next v7 3/7] ixgbe: Add a RETA query command to VF-PF channel API
>>
>> 82599 and x540 VFs and PF share the same RSS redirection table (RETA). Therefore we
>> just return it for all VFs. x550 on the other hand provides a separate redirection
>> table for each VF (there is a per-pool RETA table).
>>
>> For 82599 and x540 RETA table is an array of 32 registers (128 bytes) and the maximum number of
>> registers that may be delivered in a single VF-PF channel command is 15. Therefore
>> we will deliver the whole table in 3 steps: 12, 12 and 8 registers in each
>> step correspondingly.
>>
>> For x550 VFs RETA is a 64 byte array, so we may deliver it in two steps: 12 and 4 registers
>> correspondingly.
>>
>> Thus this patch does the following:
>>
>> - Adds a new API version (to specify a new commands set).
>> - Adds the IXGBE_VF_GET_RETA command to the VF-PF commands set.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vlad Zolotarov <vladz@...udius-systems.com>
>> ---
> <snip>
>
> +static int ixgbe_get_vf_reta(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter, u32 *msgbuf, u32 vf)
> +{
> + struct ixgbe_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
> + int i, j;
> + u32 *reta = &msgbuf[1];
> + u32 mask = 0;
> + u32 psrtype;
> + u32 reta_offset_dw = msgbuf[IXGBE_VF_RETA_OFFSET];
> + u32 dwords = msgbuf[IXGBE_VF_RETA_SZ];
> +
> + /* verify the PF is supporting the correct API */
> + if (!adapter->vfinfo[vf].rss_query_enabled ||
> + (adapter->vfinfo[vf].vf_api != ixgbe_mbox_api_12))
> + return -EPERM;
> +
> + psrtype = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_PSRTYPE(vf));
> +
> + /* The redirection table is composed as follows:
> + * 82598: 128 (8 bit wide) entries containing pair of 4 bit RSS indices
> + * 82599/X540: 128 (8 bit wide) entries containing 4 bit RSS index X550:
> + * 512 (8 bit wide) entries containing 6 bit RSS index
> + *
> + * PSRTYPE[n].RQPL defines if 0, 1 or 2 bits from the redirection table
> + * value should be used.
> + */
> +
> + if ((psrtype & (1 << 29)) == (1 << 29))
> + mask = 0x01010101;
> + else if ((psrtype & (2 << 29)) == (2 << 29))
> + mask = 0x03030303;
> + else
> + mask = 0;
> +
> + switch (hw->mac.type) {
> + case ixgbe_mac_82599EB:
> + case ixgbe_mac_X540:
> + /* Read the appropriate portion of RETA */
> + for (i = 0; i < dwords; i++)
> + reta[i] = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw,
> + IXGBE_RETA(i + reta_offset_dw));
> + break;
> + case ixgbe_mac_X550:
> + case ixgbe_mac_X550EM_x:
> + /* X550 has a per-VF RETA */
> + for (i = 0, j = reta_offset_dw; i < dwords; i++, j++)
> + reta[i] = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw,
> + IXGBE_PFVFRETA(j, vf));
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -1;
>
> There is no need to query the X550 info through the mailbox - this information can be obtained directly from the VF registers.
I couldn't find an x550 spec anywhere. Could u tell me where it may be found?
>
> Thanks,
> Emil
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists