[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150330090315.68ce923d@leda.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 09:03:15 +0200
From: Christian Hesse <list@...rm.de>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Christian Hesse <mail@...rm.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ip-link: allow human readable output with base of
1024 only for byte counts
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org> on Sun, 2015/03/29 22:58:
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 12:24:08 +0100
> Christian Hesse <list@...rm.de> wrote:
>
> > From: Christian Hesse <mail@...rm.de>
> >
> > Counting bytes with a base of 1024 is ok. Counting packets, errors, etc
> > that way makes no sense.
> > So only print byte counts with a base of 1024 if option -iec is given.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Hesse <mail@...rm.de>
>
> This changes the output which users expect, especially the packet counts
> should follow existing practice. And I doubt anyone would have 1024 errors.
With current code you can give -iec and everything (including errors) is
printed with IEC units. This patch changes it to only print byte counts with
IEC units, so error will be displayed with a base of 1000 always.
I think my patch changes things to what user expects, no?
--
main(a){char*c=/* Schoene Gruesse */"B?IJj;MEH"
"CX:;",b;for(a/* Chris get my mail address: */=0;b=c[a++];)
putchar(b-1/(/* gcc -o sig sig.c && ./sig */b/42*2-3)*42);}
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists