[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5519273F.6080209@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:36:47 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/2] can: fix multiple delivery of a single
CAN frame for overlapping CAN filters
On 03/30/2015 12:29 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> On 30.03.2015 11:50, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>
>>> can_err_mask_t err_mask;
>>> + struct sk_buff __percpu **uniq_skb;
>>> + ktime_t __percpu *uniq_tstamp;
>>
>> What about creating a struct to hold the ktime_t and the skb? BTW: the
>> pointer to the skb can be marked as const.
>
> Don't think so.
>
> The pointer points to some allocated memory.
Yes, but the allocated memory points to a skb which is not modified, so
it's a:
struct sk_buff __percpu * const *uniq_skb;
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists