netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 13/18] switchdev: remove unused NETIF_F_HW_SWITCH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 30 Mar 2015 06:38:21 -0700
From:	roopa <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:	sfeldma@...il.com
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, jiri@...nulli.us, linux@...ck-us.net,
	f.fainelli@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 13/18] switchdev: remove unused NETIF_F_HW_SWITCH_OFFLOAD

On 3/30/15, 1:40 AM, sfeldma@...il.com wrote:
> From: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
>
> Flag is no longer needed so remove it.  Using the attr get/set recurse algo
> obsoletes the flag.  Setting the flag on bond/team interface, even when the
> consitient member ports didn't have flag set was confusing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>

The flag was there to avoid the recursive lowerdev walk where possible.
bond will have the flag if any one slave can have it. You don't walk the 
bond if it does not have the flag.
Also, this allows the user to disable the feature from userspace if 
required and move everything to software.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html