[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <551BBE8B.6060707@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 11:46:51 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] can: fix multiple delivery of a single
CAN frame for overlapping CAN filters
On 04/01/2015 11:44 AM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>> On 04/01/2015 07:50 AM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> >> +struct uniqframe {
>>> + const struct sk_buff *skb;
>>> + ktime_t tstamp;
>>> +};
>>
>> Nitpick: as ktime_t is always a 64 bit value, I think putting it first
>> might provide better alignment.
>
> No objections. Good idea.
Thanks.
>> No need to repost, I'll change this while applying, if you're okay with
>> this.
>
> I would suggest to take both patches into can-next (for 4.1).
I'll create a pull-request asap.
Marc.
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists