netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC 10/10] dpaa

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1428083639.13180.44.camel@perches.com>
Date:	Fri, 03 Apr 2015 10:53:59 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Madalin-Cristian Bucur <madalin.bucur@...escale.com>
Cc:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"ruxandra.radulescu@...escale.com" <ruxandra.radulescu@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 10/10] dpaa_eth: add trace points

On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 17:29 +0000, Madalin-Cristian Bucur wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Joe Perches [mailto:joe@...ches.com]
> >
> > On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 19:19 +0300, Madalin Bucur wrote:
> > > Add trace points on the hot processing path.
> > 
> > more trivia:
> > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth_trace.h
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth_trace.h
> > []
> > > +#define fd_format_name(format)	{ qm_fd_##format, #format }
> > > +#define fd_format_list	\
> > > +	fd_format_name(contig),	\
> > > +	fd_format_name(sg)
> > 
> > Are these used anywhere?
> Yes, by the Frame Descriptor print:
> 
>         /* This is what gets printed when the trace event is triggered */
>         TP_printk(TR_FMT,
>                   __get_str(name), __entry->fqid, __entry->fd_addr,
>                   __print_symbolic(__entry->fd_format, fd_format_list), 		// <-- here
>                   __entry->fd_offset, __entry->fd_length, __entry->fd_status)

Thanks.

I think it's nicer when format and argument match
and aren't indirected by macros.

Perhaps this would be better as:

	TP_printk("[%s] fqid=%d, fd: addr=0x%llx, format=%s, off=%u, len=%u, status=0x%08x"
		  __get_str(name), __entry->fqid, __entry->fd_addr,
		  __print_symbolic(__entry->fd_format, fd_format_list),
		  __entry->fd_offset, __entry->fd_length, __entry->fd_status)


> Checkpatch seems to be less forgiving if the long string is not in a printk:

checkpatch is brainless, people aren't.

> WARNING: line over 80 characters
> #22: FILE: drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth_trace.h:47:
> +#define TR_FMT "[%s] fqid=%d, fd: addr=0x%llx, format=%s, off=%u, len=%u, status=0x%08x"

That's a checkpatch defect.  Thanks.  I'll see about fixing it.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html