[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <551F85DE.3010804@iogearbox.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 08:34:06 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tc: cls_bpf: make ingress and egress qdiscs
consistent
On 04/04/2015 02:14 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 4/3/15 4:48 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> On 04/04/2015 01:26 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>> On 04/04/2015 01:11 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> ...
>>>> nope. will take it back.
>>>> that doesn't work, since this check cannot be done in ingress_enqueue(),
>>>> because it sees the pointer to first filter only, so both TCQ_F_INGRESS
>>>> flag and CLS_REQUIRES_L2 flag need to be checked inside
>>>
>>> So on a quick glance, we're calling into cls_bpf_classify() in
>>> tp->classify()
>>> (net/sched/cls_api.c +265), so all remaining filters in that list we're
>>> traversing in cls_bpf_classify() are all BPF filters, no?
>>
>> I see, you mean the classifier chain, not the chain of filters within
>> the cls_bpf classifier, ok.
>
> yes. the chain of classifiers can have different types, so we
> cannot check it once in ingress_enqueue().
> As you said we can refactor it later.
Too many indirections. :/ Yes, I'm fine with that, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists