netdev - linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the net-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150407170056.2d89261e@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 7 Apr 2015 17:00:56 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the net-next tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
include/linux/bpf.h between commit 0fc174dea545 ("ebpf: make internal
bpf API independent of CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL ifdefs") from the net-next
tree and commit 4e537f7fbdce ("bpf: Make internal bpf API independent
of CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL #ifdefs") from the tip tree.

I fixed it up (they are the same patch and there are other changes in
the net-next tree, so I just used that version) and can carry the fix
as necessary (no action is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped