lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 21:48:57 -0700 From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> CC: daniel@...earbox.net, jiri@...nulli.us, jhs@...atatu.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] tc: make ingress and egress qdiscs consistent On 4/7/15 8:22 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > but it seems no one cares about using them with ingress, so I'll go back > to cls_bpf specific skb_share_check and push. that didn't work either :( we cannot replace skb via skb_share_check() inside cls/act. We cannot do it inside ingress_enqueue() either. It can only be done at handle_ing() level. And it's quite ugly to change the signatures of the whole qdisc->enqueue() call chain just for cls_bpf. May be introducing bpf-only ingress qdisc to decouple the logic is not such a bad idea? Then ing_filter() can special case it just like != noop_qdisc. Or a flag for existing ingress qdisc? Will see how it looks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists