[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55255D48.7040408@iogearbox.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 18:54:32 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jhs@...atatu.com,
jiri@...nulli.us, tgraf@...g.ch, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] tc: make ingress and egress qdiscs consistent
On 04/08/2015 06:44 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 4/8/15 9:32 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
>> Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 09:26:36 -0700
>>
>>> My preference is to add 'needs_l2' flag to ingress qdisc.
>>
>> The problem is that needs_l2 is not property of individual qdisc,
>> but conditionally 1 or more things sitting behind it.
>>
>> You can mix u32 and bpf classifiers. One wants need_L2 another
>> does not, and you therefore cannot handle this problem in this
>> manner.
>
> that is still ok.
> I'm proposing multiple flags. One for ingress qdisc and another
> flag for all cls/acts whether they care about l2 or not.
> Then when cls is attached to ingress_with_l2 we will check whether
> this cls is ready or not.
> so cls_bpf will have flag L2_ONLY
> whereas cls_u32 will be L2 | L3
> and 50% of other cls/acts will be L2 | L3
> some cls/acts will be L3 only until they're fixed.
>
> The users will create ingress qdisc with 'needs_l2' flag only
> when they need to attach cls_bpf to it. All existing users
> won't notice the change.
I think that could work, it would also allow for keeping compat
with the existing users.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists