[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55252CDD.8020503@iogearbox.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 15:27:57 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] tc: make ingress and egress qdiscs consistent
On 04/08/2015 03:14 PM, Thomas Graf wrote:
> On 04/08/15 at 08:58am, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>> On 04/08/15 08:31, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>> That means the tc's cls_u32
>>> sample selectors a la ip, ip6, udp, tcp, icmp don't work on ingress
>>> either,so in u32 speak you would need to do that by hand, but that
>>> doesn't work as you don't have the Ethernet type context available.
>>> Am I missing something? :)
>>
>> u32 works fine. I am sure i have tests which run these on both
>> in/egress.
>
> His point is that an u32 filter written for egress won't work at
> ingress because the offsets are different. This has always been the
> case and we can't break this behaviour either. I'm sure you have
> these weird negative offset u32 egress filters in your repertoire
> as well ;-)
Okay, you can use negative offsets in cls_u32 to accomodate for
that; so yeah, you'd need to implement your filter differently
on ingress. That should also work on cls_bpf et al.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists