[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhQ2w-13aN9ghe8mJTe=Gekzx-q-A_5+DCjmiprNoPOuAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 16:47:54 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] selinux/nlmsg: add RTM_GETNSID
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Nicolas Dichtel
<nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com> wrote:
> Le 09/04/2015 13:10, Paul Moore a écrit :
> [snip]
>>>
>>> --- a/security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c
>>> +++ b/security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c
>>> @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ static struct nlmsg_perm nlmsg_route_perms[] =
>>> { RTM_DELMDB, NETLINK_ROUTE_SOCKET__NLMSG_WRITE },
>>> { RTM_GETMDB, NETLINK_ROUTE_SOCKET__NLMSG_READ },
>>> { RTM_NEWNSID, NETLINK_ROUTE_SOCKET__NLMSG_WRITE },
>>> + { RTM_DELNSID, NETLINK_ROUTE_SOCKET__NLMSG_READ },
>>> { RTM_GETNSID, NETLINK_ROUTE_SOCKET__NLMSG_READ },
>>> };
>>
>>
>> Can you elaborate a bit on the RTM_DELNSID type? Based only on the
>> name I wonder if it should be treated as a "write" and not a "read"
>> operation.
>
> The user is not allowed to delete a nsid (no method is implemented). This
> RTM_DELNSID is only used for notifications.
Okay, thanks for clearing that up.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists