[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150409102528.GC1166@katana>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 12:25:28 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Cc: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Willy Tarreau <willy@...a-x.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] i2c-parport: return proper error values from attach
> It doesn't really matter that the error codes are different, it matters
> that they are meaningful. As much as possible you should pass error
> codes from the lower layers. parport_claim_or_block() and
> i2c_bit_add_bus() return proper error codes so you should record and
> transmit them.
Oh, surely yes. I assumed they don't and this series is a first step to
fix this. Should have looked myself. Thanks for jumping in here.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists