netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/7] net: refactor __netif_receive_skb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55282AED.1050306@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 10 Apr 2015 12:56:29 -0700
From:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
To:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] net: refactor __netif_receive_skb_core

On 04/10/2015 05:15 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> +another_round:
> +	ret = __netif_receive_skb_ingress(skb, pfmemalloc, orig_dev);
> +	switch (ret) {
> +	case NET_RX_SUCCESS:
> +	case NET_RX_DROP:
> +		break;
> +	case __NET_RX_ANOTHER_ROUND:
> +		goto another_round;
> +	}
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> 

Couldn't this just be done as a do while?  It would probably be easier
to read and there wouldn't be any need for the another_round label anymore.

- Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html