netdev - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/3 net-next] e1000: Allocate pm_qos

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 09 Apr 2015 21:35:39 -0700
From:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/3 net-next] e1000: Allocate
 pm_qos_req as needed

On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 17:08 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-04-10 at 01:43 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
> > e1000 is the only driver requiring pm_qos_req, instead of causing
> > every device to waste up to 240 bytes. Allocate it for the specific
> > driver.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> >  include/linux/netdevice.h                  |  2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> Small nitpick, it is e1000e not e1000 that you are modifying.

So other than the patch title and description referencing e1000 instead
of e1000e, patch looks fine.

Acked-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)