[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150410084816.GB23070@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 09:48:16 +0100
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 net-next] net_device: Add minimal padding to allow
for net_device pointer alignment
On 04/09/15 at 05:34pm, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-04-10 at 01:43 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> > index b2775f0..2b43aba 100644
> > --- a/net/core/dev.c
> > +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> > @@ -6794,8 +6794,7 @@ struct net_device *alloc_netdev_mqs(int sizeof_priv, const char *name,
> > alloc_size = ALIGN(alloc_size, NETDEV_ALIGN);
> > alloc_size += sizeof_priv;
> > }
> > - /* ensure 32-byte alignment of whole construct */
> > - alloc_size += NETDEV_ALIGN - 1;
> > + alloc_size += PTR_ALIGN_PAD(struct net_device, NETDEV_ALIGN);
> >
> > p = kzalloc(alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_REPEAT);
> > if (!p)
>
>
> I believe code intent was to get an alignment even if kmalloc() returns
> say 0xxxxx0008.
>
> AFAIK, SLAB in debug mode was able to do this.
I assumed kmalloc would guarantee alignment of the return pointer as
indicated by __alignof__ but I now realize that this can't possibly be the
case. kmalloc only knows about the size. We'll have to drop patch 3.
Fortunately it's still below 2K.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists