[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB4PR05MB448D41F0471F690E688F6BCC5E70@DB4PR05MB448.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 06:47:11 +0000
From: Eli Cohen <eli@...lanox.com>
To: Honggang LI <honli@...hat.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [linux-next PATCH] mlx5: wrong page mask if
CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT enabled for 32Bit architectures
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 08:33:33AM +0800, Honggang LI wrote:
>
> Yes, replaced all of the PAGE_MASK in the file. Please see attched new
> patch.
>
I think you need to send the new patch inline in your email.
> >
> > @@ -241,7 +243,7 @@ static void free_4k(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, u64 addr) static int alloc_system_page(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, u16 func_id) {
> > struct page *page;
> > - u64 addr;
> > + u64 addr = 0; [Eli] Why is this required?
>
> For 32bit architectures, if CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT disabled and
> physical memory is less than 4GB, dma_map_page will return an u32 integer
> less than 0xffff_ffff. And if addr had been initialized with random
> rubbish in the stack of alloc_system_page, the high four bytes is
> unpredictable. The new mask, MLX5_NUM_4K_IN_PAGE, will reserve the high
> four bytes. So, free_4k/find_fw_page will randomly failed.
>
Sorry, I still don't understand the issue here. MLX5_NUM_4K_IN_PAGE is
not a mask and will always get the correct value which is fairly
small.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists