[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150413082600.GA16323@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:26:00 +0100
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jiri@...nulli.us,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, jhs@...atatu.com, jesse@...ira.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v3] tc: introduce OpenFlow classifier
On 04/12/15 at 06:03pm, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 08:36:18PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> >
> > It's easy to parameterize what flow dissector does and share code.
>
> yes. Though I wouldn't pessimize ixgbe rx path even by single
> cycle to accommodate openflow spec. As far as I understand the
> skb_flow_dissect() job from driver point of view is to figure
> out header length for copybreak, which includes parsing encaps,
> whereas openflow stops at outer header. Even with this difference,
> it surely can be parameterized. Would be great to share if it
> doesn't cost rx anything.
A flow dissector that only extracts what's needed would benefit
everyone. I guess static keys could help here as the flow field
selection is definitely a slow path operation.
Even OVS could benefit from this eventually, it would just need
to do a full extract before the key is sent to user space.
Also, the logic to generate the wildcard mask and match on it
should be generalized as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists