[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <B5657A6538887040AD3A81F1008BEC63CF58CE@AVMB1.qlogic.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 18:11:47 +0000
From: Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "bind@...s.net" <bind@...s.net>,
"peter@...leysoftware.com" <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Ariel Elior <Ariel.Elior@...gic.com>,
"Willem de Bruijn" <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net] bnx2x: Fix netpoll interoperability
> I believe the original busypoll yield concern was forgotten or reversed.
> If you have many busypoll users, they might get the 'lock', and the poor
> cpu that received the hardware interrupt and raised RX softirq for this
> RX queue will spin forever [1]
> busypoll users should backoff and not attempt to grab a lock (especially
> if this lock is not a ticket lock anymore) if the softirq handler is
> desperately trying to make progress.
> [1]
> sofirq handler
> while (1) {
> if (!bnx2x_fp_lock_napi())
> continue;
bnx2x returns the budget, it doesn't loop in the poll function.
[I don't have the napi_poll logic in mind, but I do hope it doesn't iterate
repeatedly but rather only on next re-schedule]
> }
> }
> I can provide an alternative patch if you like.
If you're willing to make the effort, sure.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists