netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/7 RFC] Netfilter/nf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150414090048.GA14022@casper.infradead.org>
Date:	Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:00:48 +0100
From:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, pablo@...filter.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7 RFC] Netfilter/nf_tables ingress support

On 04/13/15 at 09:19pm, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Now the advantages of being able to use nft. First, the obvious
> one is that we have a nice userspace tool, a well defined
> grammar, and that people would be able to use the same tool for
> very similar tasks. nftables in the kernel is almost completely
> lockless, we support way more possibilites already and we won't
> have to add new special case TC actions anymore. Look at the
> connmark action for example. It can set a value. How long until
> someone wants to use a bitmask? We support all operations
> (assignment, bit operations) for all types, we have sets for fast
> lookups, maps for associating values quickly, we have a nice and
> readable syntax and full translation back to the readable
> representation and much more.

*cough* Performance numbers? *cough* ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html