lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <552EBCA8.6090408@psc.edu>
Date:	Wed, 15 Apr 2015 15:31:52 -0400
From:	rapier <rapier@....edu>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Question] TCP stack performance decrease since 3.14

All,

First, my apologies if this came up previously but I couldn't find 
anything using a keyword search of the mailing list archive.

As part of the on going work with web10g I need to come up with baseline 
TCP stack performance for various kernel revision. Using netperf and 
super_netperf* I've found that performance for TCP_CC, TCP_RR, and 
TCP_CRR has decreased since 3.14.

	3.14	3.18	4.0 	decrease %
TCP_CC	183945	179222	175793	4.4%
TCP_RR	594495	585484	561365	5.6%
TCP_CRR	98677	96726	93026	5.7%

Stream tests have remained the same from 3.14 through 4.0.

All tests were conducted on the same platform from clean boot with stock 
kernels.

So my questions are:

Has anyone else seen this or is this a result of some weirdness on my 
system or artifact of my tests?

If others have seen this or is just simply to be expected (from new 
features and the like) is it due to the TCP stack itself or other 
changes in the kernel?

If so, is there anyway to mitigate the effect of this via stack tuning, 
kernel configuration, etc?

Thanks!

Chris


* The above results are the average of 10 iterations of super_netperf 
for each test. I can run more iterations to verify the results but it 
seem consistent. The number of parallel processes for each test was 
tuned to produce the maximum test result. In other words, enough to push 
things but not enough to cause performance hits due to being 
cpu/memory/etc bound. If anyone wants the full results and test scripts 
just let me know.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ