[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1429092946.7346.74.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 03:15:46 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc: 'David Miller' <davem@...emloft.net>,
"viro@...IV.linux.org.uk" <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/17] get rid of the size argument of sock_sendmsg()
On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 08:37 +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: David Miller
> > Sent: 14 April 2015 18:56
> > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 04:25:24PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> > >> From: Al Viro
> > >> > Sent: 11 April 2015 22:18
> > >> > it's equal to iov_iter_count(&msg->msg_iter) in all cases
> > >>
> > >> I don't know whether this is guaranteed for iov[] that come from
> > >> userspace.
> > >>
> > >> In any case iov_iter_count() is non-trivial and you don't
> > >> really want to call it when unnecessary.
> > >
> > > Really?
> > >
> > > static inline size_t iov_iter_count(struct iov_iter *i)
> > > {
> > > return i->count;
> > > }
> >
> > This just made my day.
>
> I hate accessor functions
It is quite clear you do not really tweak linux code, do you ?
Typical linux developers love them when they want to add in accessor a
debugging facility or logic.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists